BHD. 9-3A-1, JLN METRO PERDANA BARAT 1, TMN USAHAWAN KEPONG UTARA, 52100 KUALA LUMPUR WP KUALA LUMPUR A V I E N T C O L O R A N T S M A L A Y S I A S D N . B H D . 2 11 23 12 10 10 1 2 11 22 1 3 10 10 1 SOH SOCK LAN S1189628F 603-62583692 PENGARAH 2 1 09-Jun-2021 440790-X WP KUALA LUMPUR KUALA LUMPUR 5 2 1 0 0 9-3A-1, JLN METRO PERDANA BARAT 1, TMN USAHAWAN KEPONG UTARA,

Feierfeil-Straße 3 2380 Perchtoldsdorf GESCHÄFTSZWEIG 1 Handelsgewerbe und Handelsvertretung KAPITAL 1 EUR 35.000 STICHTAG für JAHRESABSCHLUSS 1 31. Dezember JAHRESABSCHLUSS (zuletzt eingetragen; weitere siehe Historie) 2 zum 31.12.2019 eingereicht am 19.06.2020 1 Erklärung über die Errichtung der Gesellschaft 001 vom 18.07.2019 5 Generalversammlungsbeschluss vom 31.03.2021 002 Änderung der Erklärung über die Errichtung der Gesellschaft in Punkt 1. EUR 35.000 1 ..................................................

IMPACT PROTECTION D E S I G N A N D M A T E R I A L S O L U T I O N S Avient Corporation 1 PROJECT KICK OFF B R I E F Application: Protective sports equipment Challenge: Provide functional material to protect against impact for chest protector Requirements: • Compact - reduce thickness and weight for improved comfort and functionality • Meet EN standards • EN1621-1 level 2 & EN1621-2 level 1 • Eliminate the use of foam and glue • Be waterproof and easy to clean • Sustainable • Easy to prototype & considers manufacturing efficiency Avient Corporation 2 VIBRATION DAMPING TECHNOLOGY (VDT) H O W D O E S I T W O R K ? Avient Corporation 3 Simplified Drop Test • 65g steel ball • Dropped from 305mm • Onto 3.175mm thickness flat samples Materials Tested • Standard TPE 30 Shore A • TPU alloy 60 Shore A • Damping TPE 32 Shore A VDT reduces bounce Avient Corporation 4 SIMULATION & CALIBRATION E N 1 6 2 1 - 1 L E V E L 2 Image courtesy of Airobag TV https://www.youtube.com/c/AirobagTV/videos Simulation of Impact A weight dropped onto protective element in contact with rigid substrate https://www.youtube.com/c/AirobagTV/videos Avient Corporation 5 SIMULATION & CALIBRATION E N 1 6 2 1 - 1 L E V E L 2 REFINING THE DESIGN D E S I G N A N D M A T E R I A L C O M B I N A T I O N Avient Corporation 6 • A number of different shapes and designs are created and simulated to determine which one works best • Refining to meet EN standard • VDT TPEs can help reach compliance with EN1621-1 level 2 and EN1621-2 level 1 • Optimum protection can be achieved by combining industrial design and engineering Avient Corporation 7 VALIDATION P R O T O T Y P I N G W I T H 3 D P R I N T I N G 3D Printing Validation -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% Density Tensile Strength // Tear resistance // Rebound resilience 2mm 3D Printed VDT vs Injection Molded VDT can be 3D printed for concept evaluation early in the design process SUMMARY Avient Corporation 8 • Enabled a new, compact design with a customized VDT TPE formulation • Improved user comfort and functionality • Fulfilled EN standards • Reduced number of prototyping tools required • Reduced time spent in product development by 40 percent, enabling faster commercialization of product

Attachment 1 Special items (1) 1)

June 1, 2018 June 1, 2018 Rose, Vice President, Corporate Communications, PolyOne Corporation, +1 440-930-3162, kyle.rose@avient.com

Gain insight into the future of color with Avient's Color Forecast 2015

With more than 200,000 attendees expected from around the world, we are poised to demonstrate the passion we have for material science and polymer formulation that can help manufacturers design and innovate for the future." Swanson, Director, Investor Relations, PolyOne Corporation, +1 440-930-1018, eric.swanson@avient.com; Media Contact: Kyle G. Rose, Vice President, Corporate Communications, PolyOne Corporation, +1 440-930-3162, kyle.rose@avient.com

The extract contains both the existing activities under the old classification of 2003, valid until 31/12/2007, as the new classification of 2008, valid from 1/1/2008. The extract contains both the existing activities under the old classification of 2003, valid until 31/12/2007, as the new classification of 2008, valid from 1/1/2008. The extract contains both the existing activities under the old classification of 2003, valid until 31/12/2007, as the new classification of 2008, valid from 1/1/2008.

Together we can unlock the powerful potential of a future envisioned by you... and shared by us all.

KEY PERFORMANCE ADVANTAGES Southern Yellow Pine1 Equivalent Wood Pole GridCore FRP Pole2 14 in x .750 in Length (ft) Load Class3 Allowable Class Load4 (kip) Weight (lb) Deflection5 (in) Weight (lb) Deflection5 (in) 40 3 1.95 1360 35 1040 12 2 2.41 1580 32 14 1 2.93 1810 30 18 H1 3.51 2050 28 21 H2 4.16 2310 26 25 45 3 1.95 1630 45 1170 17 2 2.41 1880 41 21 1 2.93 2160 38 26 H1 3.51 2450 36 31 H2 4.16 2760 33 37 50 3 1.95 1910 56 1300 24 2 2.41 2210 52 30 1 2.93 2530 48 36 H1 3.51 2880 45 44 H2 4.16 3240 42 52 55 3 1.95 2210 68 1430 33 2 2.41 2550 63 40 1 2.93 2930 58 49 H1 3.51 3320 54 59 H2 4.16 3740 51 70 60 3 1.95 2520 82 1560 43 2 2.41 2910 76 53 1 2.93 3340 70 65 H1 3.51 3790 65 78 H2 4.16 4270 61 92 65 3 1.95 2840 97 1690 56 2 2.41 3290 90 69 1 2.93 3770 83 84 H1 3.51 4280 77 100 H2 4.16 4820 72 119 70 3 1.95 3180 114 1820 71 2 2.41 3690 105 87 1 2.93 4220 97 106 H1 3.51 4790 90 127 H2 4.16 5390 85 150 POLE SELECTION GUIDE 1 Wood properties data are per ANSI O5.1-2022 Table 1. Allowable Class loads are based on NESC Table 261-1. GridCore FRP Pole Southern Yellow Pine Equivalent Wood Pole Nominal Fiber Stress, F (psi) 45,000 8,000 NESC constructiona Grade B Strength factor, ɸa 1.0 0.65 Modulus of Elasticity, Eb (106 psi) 5.00 2.13 Estimated Density (lb/ft3) 120 65 DESIGN PARAMETERS a Per NESC Table 261-1 b Wood data are per ANSI O5.1-2022 Table 1.